In
my last post the author of "The Persecution of Orthodoxy" (10-5-17), used
the degradation of Plato's Academy as an introduction to what he believes is a
current crisis within the Catholic Church: an internal assault on Catholic
orthodoxy.
The
following selection is from yet another article that focuses in on the
perceived ongoing assault on Catholic orthodoxy (though posted today, it is
dated 11-1-17). This contribution utilizes a quotation from St. Vincent of
Lerins as a platform for his reflections. Note the following:
A crisis of doctrine, such
as the one through which the Catholic Church is now passing, has several sad
effects. Most obviously, the truth is obscured, with unthinkable consequences
for the salvation of souls. Heretical movements often unleash immoderate rage
against orthodox believers (look at the ongoing clampdown on theological debate, and the
well-grounded fears of the clergy). But the most obvious result
is the very evident grief among faithful Catholics. I keep hearing or reading
things like, “It’s so tempting to just give up,” or “I don’t know how to
explain this to my kids.” It may be only a small minority who are aware of the
crisis, so far, but that minority is growing. The other day I bumped into an
acquaintance who I can’t remember previously saying a thing about Vatican
politics. Almost the first words out of his mouth were: “It’s terrible, isn’t
it?”
St. Vincent of Lerins referred to this as a “great
trial” for Catholics: to keep one’s faith when it is coming under
attack—hardest of all, when it is being attacked by distinguished teachers. How
agonizing, for instance, for Origen’s followers, when he began to teach error.
No one was more learned, more virtuous, more courageous, more inspirational,
than Origen—and then he started to teach heresy! “Truly,” St. Vincent writes,
thus of a sudden to seduce the Church
which was devoted to him, and hung upon him through admiration of his genius,
his learning, his eloquence, his manner of life and influence, while she had no
fear, no suspicion for herself—thus, I say, to seduce the Church, slowly and
little by little, from the old religion to a new profaneness, was not only a
trial, but a great trial.
The article concludes with:
I do not know what the correct
response is. But in this time of anxiety, the words of St. Vincent of Lerins
may offer some comfort. If a heresy spreads and acquires strength, St.
Vincent says, it is
“because the Lord your God does make trial of you, whether you love Him or
not.” St. Paul said that “there must needs be heresies, that they who are
approved may be made manifest among you.” So each doctrinal crisis, St. Vincent
tells us, is a chance to renew our love for Our Lord: “If the authors of
heresies are not immediately rooted up by God … [it is] that it may be apparent
of each individual, how tenacious and faithful and steadfast he is in his love
of the Catholic faith.”
[Full article online HERE.]
Grace and peace,
3 comments:
Hi Jensen,
Thanks much for taking the time to share some of your thoughts; I particularly found the following to be spot-on:
==I think that the protestant use of history and tradition is a bit problematic for their own perspective, and a bit ad hoc to qualify 'heresy is disagreement with the historic position of Christianity AS UNDERSTOOD FROM A PROTESTANT VIEW' why care about history anyway if sola scriptura? I think some protestants want it both ways, and use tradition as a taxi-cab, using it to make a point, but getting off where it clashes with their views.
I guess they use it to support what they think the Bible by itself means, but then it becomes redundant, in fact epiphenomenal to the argument they give. The Bible doesn't say X because the Church has said that for centuries, right? If the Bible says X, you can deduce that apart from what others have said over the centuries.
But many protestants use tradition to show what the Bible says, which seems to imply that tradition is a reliable guide in theology - so why not ride it all the way and become Orthodox or Catholic? It seems only a milquetoast appeal to traditional, as trivially true but ultimately irrelevant, is all the protestant qua protestant can hope fore.==
From the very beginning of this blog—at the bottom of the right sidebar—I have provided a selection from A.N.S. Lane's informative essay, "Scripture, Tradition and Church: An Historical Survey". Much of what you wrote above is historically confirmed by Lane. If you have not read his entire essay, I highly suggest that you do so. A PDF copy can be accessed online via THIS LINK.
Grace and peace,
David
Post a Comment